Challenging Debtors’ Prison Practices in Ferguson
Fant et al. v. City of Ferguson
In 2015, we filed a landmark challenge to the City of Ferguson’s conversion of its legal system into a mechanism for generating revenue. The lawsuit sought justice for thousands of people who alleged that Ferguson routinely violated their constitutional rights by jailing them in deplorable conditions and without the necessary legal process because they could not pay money to the City. The case was litigated by Civil Rights Corps, ArchCity Defenders, the St. Louis University School of Law Civil Litigation Clinic, and White & Case LLP.
Unlike its neighbor, the City of Jennings, which settled our case against it by paying the almost 2,000 people who were illegally jailed and by reforming its entire municipal court system through a federal consent decree, Ferguson continued to fight us in federal court for years. During this time two of the named plaintiffs died, including lead plaintiff Keilee Fant.
On February 27, 2024, after nine years of litigation, a federal judge approved a $4.5 million settlement. The settlement amount will be paid out to over 15,000 people who were jailed by the City of Ferguson between February 8, 2010, and December 30, 2022 over unpaid fees.
Beyond financial compensation for the class members, this work set a powerful precedent for systemic changes that will have a longer-term impact. Since the filing of this lawsuit, the City has reformed its policies. In comparison to 23,832 tickets and 32,907 warrants issued in 2014, Ferguson has issued 3,114 tickets and 1,893 warrants in 2020. Municipal court revenue from these improper actions in Ferguson shrank from US$2 million in 2014 to US$200,000 in 2023. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri’s June 2022 class certification decision has also been cited by several courts and litigants, paving the way for future challenges to similar unconstitutional practices.
Media Coverage:
Missouri cities sued over municipal court practices | Washington Post | Feb 8, 2015
Ferguson One of 2 Missouri Suburbs Sued Over Gantlet of Traffic Fines and Jail | New York Times | Feb 8, 2015
Partners:
White & Case LLP
St. Louis University School of Law Civil Litigation Clinic
Filings:
Order Denying Third Motion to Dismiss (Feb 13, 2018)
Order Denying Second Motion to Dismiss (Nov 15, 2016)
Plaintiffs' Response to Second Motion to Dismiss (May 18, 2016)
Amended Complaint (Apr 13, 2016)
Original Complaint (Feb 8, 2015)
More from the Ending the Criminalization of Poverty
Sandoval v. Riverside. In May 2025, individuals detained in Riverside County jails filed a class action lawsuit challenging Riverside County’s cash-based jailing of individuals between their arrest and first court hearing, as well as Riverside County’s unnecessary delay of that hearing. Rabbi David Lazar and Reverend Jane Quandt chose to join this lawsuit because they view cash-based jailing as unconscionable. The lawsuit was filed against Riverside County Superior Court, Riverside County, the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office, and Sheriff Chad Bianco.
In partnership with public defenders in Oregon, Civil Rights Corps is challenging Oregon’s longstanding practices of jailing people charged with misdemeanors prior to trial and jailing people charged with other crimes without constitutionally required due process.
Butler v. Prince George's County. In 2022, CRC and partners filed a class action lawsuit challenging Prince George’s County's pretrial detention practices. The lawsuit seeks a declaration that PG County and its officials violate Plaintiffs’ rights under the United States and Maryland Constitutions by detaining people pretrial without meeting the substantive and procedural standards required for pretrial detention.
Urquidi v. City of Los Angeles. CRC and co-counsel brought suit in California Superior Court in November 2022 on behalf of several individuals who had been jailed for five days simply because they could not access enough cash to pay for their freedom.
Rodriguez v. Providence Community Corrections. In 2018, Civil Rights Corps announced a landmark settlement in a first-of-its-kind class action case in federal court against Rutherford County and Providence Community Corrections, Inc., a private probation company that made millions of dollars over more than a decade by exploiting the poorest people in Rutherford County.
Walker v. City of Calhoun. In 2015, Civil Rights Corps and the Southern Center for Human Rights filed a crucial lawsuit that alleged that the money bail system in Calhoun, Georgia was unconstitutional.
Edwards v. Cofield. In 2017, Civil Rights Corps and partners filed a putative class-action lawsuit alleging that the money bail system in Randolph County, Alabama, violated the constitutional rights of people charged with misdemeanors or felonies because it created a “two-tiered” system of justice based on wealth.
Robinson v. Martin. Civil Rights Corps filed a historic challenge to the unconstitutional money bail system in Cook County, Illinois. Our 2016 lawsuit alleged that the money bail system that pervaded the Chicago region, in which people are kept in jail cells solely because they cannot make monetary payments, is unconstitutional.
Hester v. Gentry. In 2018, Civil Rights Corps and partners filed a lawsuit alleging that hundreds of people in Cullman County, Alabama, are routinely jailed before trial due to their inability to pay bail in exchange for their release.